2614 Views
12 Replies
Most of the Organisations undermine the importance of Exit Interviews. An Exit Interview is an interview conducted on the relieving employee by a neutral party i.e., mostly by a HRD person to know whether the employee is leaving due to some dissatisfactions and unresolved problems faced by him in the Organisation or due to some personal reasons. If he is leaving due to some dissatisfaction caused to him by the Organsation, such things should be reported to the management and the management should consequently investigate and see whether the employee's perspective is true. If it is true the Organisation should take some corrective actions and see to it that rest of the employees would not follow suit of separating employee.
In my previous Organisation where I was employed we saw that the employee turnover was constantly being high in the organisation. And we were surprised to see there were no exit interviews at all being conducted in the Organisation. The main reason for it was that the Management percieved it as a mere HR policy which is not that important. Then we made them understand the uses of Exit Interviews as follows stating its useful in:
*Retention of Employees
*Suggestions for improvement of the existing policies and procedures.
*Exisiting policies and procedures which are making the work more difficult which needs to be corrected.
*The strengths of a particular job which can be accentuated to build a positive profile of the job.
And then I have prepared a format for Exit Interviews and got it approved by the Management and successfully implemented. And the results started yielding after a quarter and we saw a continuous reduction in the attrition rate. If not completely but to some extent we were successful in retaining some key resources.
But most of the organisations undermine the importance of Exit Interviews and burn their own organisations without even knowing the main reason for the employee turnover. If only they identify it as an important key to reduce attrition and to nullify the weaknesses of the policies and procedures being followed thats nothing like it.
I hope my friends on HRLink will agree with my opinions about Exit Interviews and share their views in regard with the same.
Regards,
Sri Manjari .V
http://hrlink.in/topics/exit-interview-techniques
Cheers!
Pradeep
Thanks for a good post on HR related topic.
Exit interviews in most of the organizations are nothing but a mere ritual as rightly pointed out by Pushpak. Sad, but true.
According to me, an exit interview is more important than the preliminary rounds of interviews conducted at the time of recruitment. Its more important because you are talking to you own employee, who has been there, done that, seen all. The perspective that you get from an employee who is leaving, most of the times is unbiased. Whatever the reason for the employee to leave the organization, the exit interview should be given the time and effort it deserves, because it is the most honest feedback you would get from an employee about your organization. At the time of leaving an organization, an employee is not unduly worried about voicing his opinion and hence he would speak the truth. Truth, which many organizations do NOT want to hear. Hence the value of an exit interviews is always undermined in such organizations. There is a popular saying "Employees do not leave organizations, but leave their managers". In spite of how much we detest this truth, it is very much prevalent and more and more people leave managers to find others, although there is no guarantee that your next manager in the next organization would be better, or less cynical, or less concerned about your career. An employee simply gets fed up and puts down his papers.
One other thing I feel should change in organizations it the timing of the Exit Interviews. Usually it is done on the employees' last working day or a day before that. Hence it just becomes a ritual. I am sure if a professional counselor talks to the employee as soon as he/she puts down his papers, am sure we should be able to make a difference in the statistics of holding them back to a significant extent. How many organizations actually invest in either maintaining a professional counselor/outsource this need to an external agency ? NIL.
Having said that, there are HR professionals who take this ritual rather seriously and try to get an idea about the probable causes that led to this irreparable damage. I call it irreparable because it takes a huge organization cost to hire a new person, train him, to put him on the job and by the time he starts being productive, it would take months of effort. Whereas, if we are able to retain the existing employee, it would mean that many months of productivity. Sounds simple ? Yes it might be simple, provided organizations started putting more emphasis on employees leaving their organizations than on hiring. The emphasis has always been on hiring, to bring in human bodies into the system. The very approach to the exit interviews have to change for organizations to cut on their humongous training costs and instead invest that money on retaining employees who are ready-made to give the productivity, that you are so afraid to lose.
Regards, Harish