Times of India: "Sophisticated online financial planning software" --> FREE Limited time offer: Sign Up Now
HR Zone » Best HR Practices » A Checklist for Successful Onboarding .........................

4697 Views
  3 Replies

+2
Vote Vote
A Checklist for Successful Onboarding .........................
Dilip
Dilip Picture
67 Posts
back to top
Posted 11-01-2009Reply



On boarding — easing a new hire into his or her job as quickly and efficiently as possible — is a technique that a growing number of businesses are adopting. But while on boarding programs are becoming increasingly popular, it's also true that many businesses fail to exploit the process to its full potential. That's a shame, because a little time and energy spent helping a worker at the beginning of his or her employment can pay big benefits in terms of job performance and loyalty for many years to come.

This checklist can help any company get the most out of its on boarding program.



Be professional. While new employees are typically concerned with putting their best foot forward, the hiring company also needs to leave a good first impression. An ad-hoc or slipshod on boarding program will make the new employee feel as if he or she has just signed up with a second-rate company. Over time, a poor on boarding program will damage employee morale, productivity and, ultimately, retention.





Be clear and precise. On boarding is a particularly terrible time to deliver weak or inconsistent messages. Miscommunication at the start of a job can lead to disastrous mistakes down the road as the employee naively performs actions that are contrary to best practices. To reinforce verbal instruction, companies should give a new hire an employee manual and other critical documents before their first day on the job.



Keep it simple and low-key. Even if the employee's new job involves complex duties and responsibilities, the on boarding process should be kept as simple and as low-key as possible. This means that while you should divulge the information that the new hire needs to know to become a full team player, you should not overload him or her with every possible bit of available intelligence. There will come a time when the new hire needs to know that the company holds a picnic every Labor Day and that Nov. 21 is the company founder's birthday. That time, however, is not the first week on the job.



Keep it interesting. On boarding, by nature, will always require new employees to fill out forms, watch orientation videos and perform various other mind-numbing tasks. But try to make the process less boring by alternating rote tasks with more engaging activities, such as touring production facilities, examining new tools and meeting colleagues.



Designate a mentor. The new hire shouldn't feel like a lonely piece of driftwood bobbing in a vast ocean. Assigning an experienced mentor to the new hire, preferably someone in the same general business area will give the newcomer a reliable escort and contact source. The mentor should be available for consultation throughout the business day for at least the first week or so of a new hire's employment. After that, you may trim access back to scheduled meetings.



Take time to listen. On boarding is a two-way process: The mentor provides facts and support, and the new hire asks crucial questions about his or her job. To facilitate the ongoing flow of information, build time into the on boarding schedule to allow both parties to sit down and discuss — uninterrupted — whatever happens to be on their minds.



Prepare the workspace. On boarding’s primary goal should be to get new hires comfortable with their jobs and working at near peak efficiency out of the starting gate. But this isn't possible if the person's workspace isn't available or is missing essential tools or materials. That's why it's important to have a permanent workspace ready as soon as the new hire arrives for work.



Provide follow-up support. Too many companies take a "sink-or-swim" approach to onboarding, designing the process as a stand-alone system with specific starting and ending dates. Actually, on boarding should be viewed as just the first step in an ongoing employee-support program. During the on boarding process, employees need to be introduced to the company's full spectrum of career-advancement, wellness, recreation and other programs, as well as encouraged to seek information and other assistance whenever the need arises.

Neil
Neil Picture
151 Posts
back to top
  Rated 0 | Posted 13-01-2009


I'm curious, Dilip, what is the difference between "On-boarding" and an induction process?

Neil

Dilip
Dilip Picture
67 Posts
back to top
  Rated 0 | Posted 14-01-2009

Dear Mr. Neil, thnx for ur Curiosity, i am attaching here with the reply ...



What is induction?

The purpose of induction is to gradually introduce a new or existing employee who has acquired a disability, to their new work environment. Induction involves gaining insight into:



the reality of a new job, i.e., the specific aspects of the work (how it is performed), the expectations of the employer and initial on- the- job training;
how an organisation works i.e. the role of the new employee within the overall work environment and how that employee interacts with and relates to supervisors, team leaders and other work colleagues.



A range of factors will determine whether or not an organisation or company provides an induction process for new staff. While in some circumstances a new employee may be thrown in at the deep end, this is not good practice and most companies or organisations will provide some form of induction, either informally (sit and watch) or through more formal procedures.

Induction is a process, which may take place irrespective of whether or not there is an official probationary period. It is usually led by a supervisor and involves the collaboration of work colleagues.

For people with disabilities who have successfully come through the interview process, effective induction is critical. Many leave their new jobs at an early stage due to the lack of or ineffective induction.

Depending on the nature and severity of the disability, it is at this stage that initial physical, communication, attitudinal and other barriers manifest themselves, requiring an appropriate response. It should be remembered that for employers, people with disabilities and co- workers, the initial response can often be experimental or temporary. The induction process should be regarded as the initial phase of an integration programme, which identifies particular needs and provides appropriate accommodations and ongoing support, as necessary.

It is equally important to remember that a new employee with a disability got the job on the basis that they are capable of undertaking the work, with (or often without) some form of accommodation or assistance. The induction process is about how to do the job and what forms of assistance are required to realise that capacity, not whether or not the job can be done. The induction period, depending on the complexity of the work environment or tasks involved, is usually quite short, but more time may be necessary when the new employee has a disability, depending on the nature and severity of that disability.

For employers, co- workers and people with disabilities, the induction process can be, to varying degrees, both a stressful and apprehensive time. The management of the work environment, appropriate assistance, education and training, collaboration of management, work colleagues and people with disabilities require sensitive consideration and appropriate action. If relevant and appropriate a job coach will work with the employer and new employee during the induction process. As the process continues, where barriers are addressed effectively, it can be a confidence- building time, where an employee with a disability can enjoy the benefits of working life and the workforce and employer can benefit from their contribution.

[Example: An employee with a learning disability is undergoing induction and on- the- job training at a company. He has been hired to deliver messages. It is noticed during his training that he often mixes up messages for ‘R. Naughton’ and ‘T. Naughton’. The supervisor knows about his disability, suspects that the performance problem is linked to it, and knows that this particular employee may be unable to ask for a reasonable accommodation because of his disability. The supervisor asks the trainee about mixing up the two names and asks if it would be helpful to spell the first name of each person. When the trainee says that would be easier, the supervisor instructs the receptionist to write the full first name when messages are left for one of the Naughtons].

Neil
Neil Picture
151 Posts
back to top
  Rated 0 | Posted 15-01-2009

Dear Mr. Neil, thnx for ur Curiosity, i am attaching here with the reply ...





... See Dilip's complete reply


Thank you for this detailed and extensive reply, it has been most enlightening.

Let me say that although I work world wide, I am based in Switzerland and trained as an HR professional through the British System and so have an Anglophone/European perception of things. To me the process you describe under the heading of "On-boarding" is a standard Induction process widely used in Europe and the US. Hence my question. The clarification has been most useful.

I think I must point out for your information that under European Legislation (N.B. European Legislation applies to all companies based in the EU no matter where the local office is) it would be illegal to have two different processes defines, one for able-bodied and one for disabled. This would be seen as discriminatory and could lead to court proceedings.

+2
Vote Vote

Recently in HR Forums

Hitesh posted a new forum topic in
06-04-2023
Arun posted a new forum topic in
15-02-2023
 
Recent (10) | HR | Both
HR | Both   1 of 10
23-09-2019
27-01-2018
27-01-2018
07-08-2017
26-05-2017
Arun
Arun
Read this topic:
Joke ####@@@####
26-05-2017
25-05-2017
03-04-2017
27-03-2017
27-03-2017